Coherence of National Food Policy and Strategic Implications for Perum BULOG
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The 2045 Food Barn vision requires coherence among production, distribution, price stabilization, food reserves, technological innovation, and institutional coordination; therefore, national food performance must be viewed as a cross-sectoral public governance issue, rather than merely a matter of production output, given that the success of food policies is heavily influenced by organizational design and the implementation capacity of various actors. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the development of Indonesia’s food performance during the 2024–2025 period, assess the coherence of national food policy design at the document level, and formulate strategic implications for the repositioning of Perum BULOG toward the 2045 Food Barn vision. Methods: The study employs an explanatory document analysis based on secondary data, combining quantitative descriptive analysis of data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) and Perum BULOG publications with a structured content analysis of six key policy documents, using the Food Policy Synergy Index (ISKP) instrument, which encompasses four dimensions and twelve operational indicators. Results and Discussion: Rice production in 2025 increased by 13.29%, while productivity rose by only 0.60%, indicating that the improvement in supply was driven more by an expansion in harvested area than by production efficiency. An ISKP score of 81.67 indicates a high level of policy design coherence, particularly in the stabilization-reserve dimension, but still reveals weaknesses in data integration, local actor participation, and policy implementation feedback mechanisms. Conclusion: The high level of coherence in policy documents is not yet sufficient proof of effective implementation on the ground. Perum BULOG needs to be strengthened as a mandate-based food intelligence hub through enhanced data interoperability, regional buffer stocks, and early warning systems to support more precise, adaptive, and evidence-based food governance toward 2045.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
catatan copyright agar disepakati oleh penulis.
Penulis sepakat dengan ketentuan-ketentuan dalam etika publikasi
Penulis menyatakan bahwa karya tulis yang diserahkan untuk diterbitkan adalah asli, belum pernah dipublikasikan di manapun dalam bahasa apapun, dan tidak sedang dalam proses pengajuan ke penerbit lain
References
Azhaara, S. R., Yulianah, Alisa, E. R., Wahyuni, T. C. N., & Khoirullahu, S. A. R. Al. (2026). Analysis of the Role of Perum Bulog in Maintaining the Stability of the National Rice Supply Chain. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 4(3), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.60079/ AJEB.V4I3.836
Badan Pangan Nasional. (2025). Rencana Aksi Badan Pangan Nasional. Badan Pangan Nasional.
Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2025). Pada 2024, Luas Panen Padi Mencapai Sekitar 10,05 Juta Hektare dengan Produksi Padi Sebanyak 53,14 Juta Ton Gabah Kering Giling (GKG) . Badan Pusat Statistik indonesia.
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A Decade of Adaptive Governance Scholarship: Synthesis and Future Directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 56. https://doi. org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356
Chirombo, B. F., & Pangapanga-Phiri, I. (2025). Adaptive Practices and Governance Structures for Building Climate Resilient Agrifood Systems Value Chains in Sub Saharan Africa. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 879-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43621-025 01837-Y
Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2018). An Organizational Approach to Public Governance: Understanding and Design. Dalam Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279003
Elbehri, A., & Chestnov, R. (2021). Digital Agriculture in Action: ArtificiaI Intelligence for Agriculture. Dalam Digital Agriculture in Action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . https://doi.org/10.4060/CB7142EN
Ghadanfar, S., & Cochrane, L. (2026). Managing Shock and Uncertainty: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Divergent Contexts of National Food Reserve Systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, 1862694. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSUFS.2026.1862694/ TEXT
Govindan, R., & Al-Ansari, T. (2019). Computational Decision Framework for Enhancing Resilience of the Energy, Water and Food Nexus in Risky Environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.06.015
Ibnu, M. (2025). Reposisi BULOG dan Integrasi Empat Dimensi FAO: Model Konseptual dan Roadmap Strategis Ketahanan Pangan Nasional Indonesia. Pangan, 34(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v34i2.901
Jamaludin, M. (2022). Indonesia’s Food Security Challenges: How Food SOE Optimizes its Role? Research Horizon, 2(3), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.54518/RH.2.3.2022.64
Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000321
Ngabito, F. M., Prahara, S., Ariawan, Uloli, M. F., & Paramani, D. (2026). Evaluasi Kebijakan Distribusi Pangan dan Stabilitas Harga di Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara: Pendekatan Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. Seikat: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 5(2), 155–167. https:// doi.org/10.55681/SEIKAT.V5I2.1690
Perum BULOG. (2024). Laporan Tahunan 2024 . https://www.bulog.co.id/2025/09/16/ laporan-tahunan-2024/
Prasetyo, T., Mantoro, T., & Kususanto, A. (2026). Intelligence Strategies to Address Disinformation Threats to the National Food Security Program Through Social Media Analysis. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35450/ JIP.V14I1.1538
Ruspayandi, T., Bantacut, T., Arifin, B., & Fahmi, I. (2022). Market-Approach-Based Policy to Achieve Rice Price Stability in Indonesia—Can It Be a Complement? Economies, 10(12), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECONOMIES10120296
Safari, M., Dr, H. S., & Jahangiri, K. (2019). Disaster Risk Governance in Iran: Document Analysis. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.4103/ JEHP.JEHP_30_19
Saragih, J. P. (2017). Kelembagaan Urusan Pangan dari Masa ke Masa dan Kebijakan Ketahanan Pangan. Pangan, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.33964/JP.V26I1.345
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/J.1467-9299.2009.01753.X;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Syndoukas, N., Mattas, K., Tsakiridou, E., Anastasiadis, F., Manikas, I., Staboulis, C., Schnell, A. A., & Morelle, C. (2026). Stakeholder-Driven Food Policy and Multilevel Governance for Agri-Food Systems Resilience: Integrating Climate Change, Food Security, and Biodiversity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ BSE.71265;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:10990836;WGROUP:STRING: PUBLICATION
Trendov, N. M., Varas, S., & Zeng, M. (2019). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas. FAO; https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/ca4985en
Zembe, A., Nemakonde, L. D., & Chipangura, P. (2022). Policy Coherence Between Food Security, Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in South Africa: A Summative Content Analysis Approach. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1), 1 11. https://doi.org/10.4102/JAMBA.V14I1.1173
Zembe, A., Nemakonde, L. D., & Chipangura, P. (2023). A Policy Coherence Framework for Food Security, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction in South Africa. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. IJDRR.2023.103877